Currently applicants have to complete the range portion of the License to Carry training with at least a .32 caliber handgun. While it sounds reasonable, this restriction has made it difficult, for some with physical limitations to complete the course. I recall a former student that had wrist surgery from months prior, and could barely handle the low recoil impulse of a diminutive .380 ACP. The range did not have a .32 caliber rental, so the student worked through the pain and completed the course with what they had. A less than enjoyable experience.While I would never actively promote a .22 caliber firearm as a primary self-defense weapon, it can get the job done. During my law enforcement career, I saw the effects of .22's and .25's on the recently expired. They wouldn't have been any "dead-er" with a .32 caliber or larger bullet.
Shooting fundamentals and safety are the same, no matter if it's a .22 or a .32. For the economically challenged, the cost savings could mean the difference between taking the course now, or putting it off until after they become a victim.
The bill has passed through 3 of the 7 stages, passing out of the Senate and on to the House. I encourage you to reach out to your representative this week and ask for their support of this bill or the companion bill HB 403.

No comments:
Post a Comment